Editor’s note: Jeffrey Bellin, an assistant professor of law at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, formerly served as a federal prosecutor in Washington, D.C.
According to police, Zimmerman claims self-defense, but many observers can’t understand how a grown man with a gun can plausibly claim that he was forced to kill a teenager armed only with some candy.
If that’s the law of self-defense in Florida (and elsewhere), these observers argue, the law needs to change.
The law of self-defense is at its core about reasonableness. If a person reasonably perceives a serious threat of harm, and uses reasonable force to meet that threat, the law justifies even deadly force, and it does so even if it turns out that the perceived threat was illusory. [CNN] FULL ARTICLE
- Trayvon Martin: Why His Killer Remains Free (inquisitr.com)
- Trayvon Martin killing in Florida puts ‘Stand Your Ground’ law on trial (csmonitor.com)
- Stand your ground: Looking beyond Trayvon Martin (mhasegawa.com)
- Are ‘Stand Your Ground’ Laws a Good Idea? (usnews.com)
- Florida Not The Only State That Has ‘Stand Your Ground’ Law (inquisitr.com)
- My Ethics: ‘Stand your ground’ laws are invitation to kill (religion.blogs.cnn.com)
- Stand Your Ground Law Comes Under Fire After Trayvon Martin Killing (inquisitr.com)
- Is Florida’s ‘Stand Your Ground’ Law To Blame In The Shooting Death Of Trayvon Martin?? (businessinsider.com)