CONSERVATIVE(?) PAUL RYAN DECRIED THE STIMULUS…BUT TRIED TO BENEFIT FROM IT


Breaking from Newsmax.com
Ryan Sought ‘Wasteful’ Stimulus for Green Firms
WASHINGTON — Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan has been one of the harshest critics of President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus plan. But months after Congress approved the nearly $800 billion package, the Wisconsin lawmaker was trying to steer money under the program to companies in his home state.
Rep. Ryan wrote letters in 2009 to Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis seeking stimulus grant money for two Wisconsin energy conservation companies. One of them, the nonprofit Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corp., later received $20.3 million from the Energy Department to help homes and businesses improve energy efficiency, according to federal records.

In a letter to Chu in December 2009, Ryan said the stimulus money would help his state create thousands of new jobs, save energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. That contrasted with his public statements denigrating the stimulus program as a “wasteful spending spree.” It also conflicts with his larger federal budget proposal, which would slash Energy Department programs aimed at creating green jobs.
Ryan’s office says his budget plan “calls for getting Washington out of the business of picking winners and losers in the economy — and that includes our energy sector.”
Ryan’s actions in Congress and as chairman of the House Budget Committee have been drawing fresh scrutiny since he was named last weekend as Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s running mate.
A Ryan spokesman, Brendan Buck, noted the congressman’s office’s previous explanations that he was “providing a legitimate constituent service.” The Wall Street Journal reported Ryan’s efforts to secure stimulus money two years ago.
“If Congressman Ryan is asked to help a Wisconsin entity applying for existing federal grant funds, he does not believe flawed policy should get in the way of doing his job,” Ryan’s office said then.
Ryan also sent three letters to Chu in October 2009 seeking stimulus money for the Energy Center of Wisconsin, another nonprofit organization that promotes energy efficiency. The company later received $190,000 in stimulus money to conduct research on geothermal heating and $50,000 more to develop a training curriculum for students at Milwaukee Area Technical College.
Ryan’s letters to the Energy Department were first reported by the Boston Globe.
“It’s another example of how he talks out of both sides of his mouth,” said Heather Taylor-Miesle, director of the NRDC Action Fund, the political arm of the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council. “It goes to show that their energy policy always has been, and probably always will be, disingenuous.”
The vice presidential contender is not alone among Republicans who criticized the stimulus plan only to seek money later. Georgia’s Republican senators, Saxby Chambliss and Johnny Isakson, for example, blasted the bill as a bloated government giveaway yet asked Defense Secretary Robert Gates to steer $50 million in stimulus money to a constituent’s bio-energy project.
Ryan’s stated views are also consistent with his running mate’s long-held position that the stimulus was a flawed idea that did not create private sector jobs.
“That stimulus didn’t work,” Romney said at an Ohio speech in June. “That stimulus didn’t put more private-sector people to work.”
Yet, in Ryan’s letter to the Labor Department in October 2009, he backed the Energy Center of Wisconsin’s grant application for stimulus money “to develop an industry-driven training and placement agenda that intends to place 1,000 workers in green jobs.”
The company did not win the Labor Department grant.
Frank Greb, president of the Energy Center of Wisconsin, said the company sought help from the entire Wisconsin congressional delegation, a practice he described as routine. He said other lawmakers — Democrats and Republicans — also sent letters in support of the grants.
“I’m not surprised that any congressman would be supportive of entities within his district if he saw merits in the work and it was going to be beneficial to constituents,” Greb said.
Ryan’s budget proposal would cut billions in Energy Department funding for the development of clean energy and eliminate loan programs that have helped support 60,000 jobs, according to Rep. Henry Waxman, top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
© 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

More…

TRMS: Rachel Maddow Interviews Former Gov. Michael Dukakis on Mitt Romney as Gov. of Massachusetts


So, that’s why Romney has been silent on his years as governor.  :)

`

Mitt, you can’t hide. Your secrets will out!

More…

It’s a Good Thing Paul Ryan Has Big Muscles!


Mitt Romney: A Liar Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow!


Choose a Presidential Candidate with Honor

HUFFINGTON POST LIVE IS HERE!


Arianna Huffington announces a leap in social media:

CLICK HERE

Just how will the Paul Ryan bounce (if any) last? Are the bookies taking odds?


I just love this dog!


HAVE A GREAT EVENING!

HUFFINGTON POST LIVE IS HERE! 1


Arianna Huffington announces a leap in social media:

CLICK HERE

At 42 y/o Is Paul Ryan in Touch with Seniors? Those Who Pioneered his Rise to Celebrity?


Paul Ryan tacitly agrees to let Mitt Romney co-opt his ideas.  You see, Mitt Romney has no core!

Mitt Romney’s announcing Paul Ryan as “our next president” is more than a freudian slip.

“Lines of Attack and Defense Emerge Over Ryan”


NATIONAL JOURNAL

By By John Aloysius Farrell

 

 

In choosing Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan as his running mate, Mitt Romney has selected:

a) A right-wing ideologue with extreme views whose economic blueprints would further enrich the wealthy; strip the middle class of hard-won medical, education and retirement benefits; expose old folks to rapacious health insurance firms; and return America to dog-eat-dog social Darwinism, redolent of the age of the robber barons,

or

b) A brave and bold young visionary in the mold of Teddy Roosevelt or John F. Kennedy who, with his intricate knowledge of the federal budget, will combine with Romney to prune extravagant government entitlements; free business from the shackles of federal regulation; relieve upper income Americans from unwise and unfair taxation; and spur the creation of millions of jobs.

So contended Democratic (a) and Republican (b) partisans and campaign operatives, who used Sunday’s talk shows as a forum to hone the lines of attack they have chosen for the coming days and weeks.

President Obama’s senior campaign advisor led the assault, calling Ryan a “right wing ideologue” who was chosen by Romney “to thrill the most strident voices in the Republican Party.”

Advisor David Axelrod said Ryan is the “intellectual energy” behind a right-wing budget plan that would “end Medicare as we know it,” slash federal student loan and research programs and “lavish millions of dollars of tax cuts, most of them on the wealthy.” He said Ryan is “outside the mainstream” on abortion rights, and reminded viewers of the ABC’s This Week that the congressman was the architect of a proposal to privatize Social Security that was “so out there” that even Republicans deserted him.

Axelrod said that the Obama campaign was happy with Romney’s decision. “I think it helps voters clarify what this choice is all about,” he said.”  FULL ARTICLE

More…